|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
ATF violating dealer license revocation rules in defiance of policy and law
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
... "The allegations come in the wake of a legal action by Brink’s, reported last week by Courthouse News Service, where the security firm 'filed a petition for discovery in Federal Court, seeking to depose Megan Bennett, Director of Industry Operations for the BATF [claiming]…that after the BATF inspected its facility in Coppell, Texas in December 2010, it received a notice of revocation from Bennett [and that] 'the revocation is illegal and against the BATF's own policies.'"
"Unlike other targets of Adverse Action Orders, Brink’s ... possesses the resources to fight back, as well as strong incentive ..." ... |
| Comment by:
gruhn
(8/9/2012)
|
| They are breaking their own rules? Of course not. If they get to make up the rules then whatever they say goes is good. If normal people didn't get the memo then that's their fault. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Law... regulation... whatever, same difference. Getting arbitrary results out of a system designed to act arbitrarily is to be expected. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
